Update: iPadOS 16 beta just fixed biggest complaint — Stage Manager is coming to older iPad Pros. When Apple introduced the new iPad Pro, the company boasted that its slim slate is more powerful than 92 percent of PCs out there.
Samsung’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 850-powered Galaxy Book 2 (3,945) doesn’t even come close to Intel-based PCs, nevermind the iPad Pro. We then turned to Adobe Lightroom to see how long it would take to export 50 RAW images to the JPEG format, and the iPad Pro once again outperformed the competition–though not by as large a margin.
If you’re wondering how efficient the A12X Bionic processor is, you’ll probably be glad to know that the new iPad Pro offers pretty great battery life. On the Laptop Mag Battery Test, which involves web surfing at 150 nits of screen brightness, Apple’s tablet lasted for 13 hours and 41 minutes.
Apple iPad Pro 2021 review: It can replace the laptop, but we don’t want it to
The new Apple iPad Pro 2021 is a solid alternative to a laptop, but you might still want to hold on to your bigger machine. Which means that Apple has suited the iPad to offer as much power as its laptops and PCs, at least on paper. It aligns with Apple’s plan of essentially making its iPads replacements for real laptops.
On the 2021 iPad the M1 improves performance, making it buttery smooth to use, delivering great battery life, etc.
However, the exact improvement in performance (where it really matters) is hard to spot unless the tasks you engage in require that kind of power. For example, my daily work involves mostly dealing with Google Docs, a proprietary Content Management System (CMS), some rudimentary photo editing, web browsing, and social media.
Apple also has its developers adapting their apps to the M1, which is good for iPad users — particularly those who are actually looking to replace their laptops with the tablet. I can and have edited and written content on the iPad as well and it works flawlessly, but if I have to stare at a screen for 9 hours a day, it’s more comfortable if it’s a bigger one. If it really came down to picking one out of the two, the iPad would make much more economic sense without compromising on what it can deliver as compared to the MacBook – and that matters. The problem areas on the 2021 iPad Pro are a slight heating issue and its front camera placement that Apple REALLY needs to change. If you are holding the iPad in your hand, you are going to end up covering the camera which interferes with the face unlocking feature unless it’s placed on the keyboard.
Tested: Why the iPad Pro really isn’t as fast a laptop
At least that’s what some tech writers proclaimed after Apple’s latest iPad Pro wonder hit the streets. Before this turns into a flame-fest, let me say this: The iPad Pro is shockingly fast, as Macworld’s review drives home, and Apple has again worked its mastery of hardware, software and virtually unlimited resources to build an amazingly fast chip for the iPad Pro. On the iPad Pro the browsers are pretty much the same, as Apple makes all use its highly optimized rendering engine. The creators of Geek Bench 3 have stated their goals are to create a cross-platform test that isolates the CPU as much as possible, using algorithms that it believes are valid for chip performance.
Fan boys have used Geek Bench 3’s performance results to write screeds that the x86-based PC (and Mac) are officially goners. While Geek Bench 3 attempts to create what its makers think is an accurate measure of CPU performance using seconds-long “real world” algorithms, BAPCo’s approach is actually more “real world.” BAPCo’s consortium of mostly hardware makers set out to create workloads across all the different platforms that would simulate what a person does, such as actually editing a photo with HDR, browsing the web, or sending email.
The benchmark has two performance modules, which give you an idea of how fast the device would be in web browsing and email. TabletMark’s V3 score indicates the iPad Pro doesn’t compete with Intel’s Broadwell or even older Haswell CPUs.
TabletMark V3 also measures photo and video performance, which gives the iPad Pro a healthy lead over the ARM competitors and the Atom X7-Z8700. Every other test I’ve run shows Skylake with a healthy performance bump over Broadwell and Haswell.
It renders the test without regard to the screen resolution and is a pretty good measurement of lower-grade graphics performance. Apple put a lot of resources into giving the A9X a bunch of graphics performance, and it shows.
Before you think the Tegra X1 will whip the A9X, you should remember that the Shield TV is thicker than any tablet and runs on unlimited AC, not DC. There’s no need to worry about chewing through the battery in the Shield TV, unlike with the upcoming Pixel C, so the latter’s graphics performance could fall shorter. It would be nice if Intel’s budget chip didn’t drag its butt across the finish line dead last in just about every test.
The result here actually puts the iPad Pro and the A9X at a pretty big disadvantage against all of the x86 chips—yes, even the lowly Atom.
The rest of the legit x86 chips are sipping lemonade and reading the paper while the iPad Pro crosses the finish line. Futuremark’s investigation led to how the A7 chip in the iPhone 5s (and iPad Air) handles non-sequential memory structures. Futuremark said it was a conscious design change Apple made between the A6 and A7 that hurt its performance, and 3DMark was showing the result of that. But rather than make a change just to help show off Apple’s performance, Futuremark chose to stick to its benchmarking method, declaring:
2021 Apple iPad Pro benchmark blitz: +50% gains on the A12Z Bionic model, beats all M1 Macs in Geekbench single-core testing, and outpaces Intel Core i9 MacBook Pro 16
The 2021 Apple iPad Pro with M1 chip has started appearing on Geekbench, and it is throwing up results that will have fans excited about making a purchase. When you compare the marks with other Apple devices you realize what a smart move it was for Cupertino to stick the M1 Silicon inside its latest tablet generation.
It’s likely the marks for the latest variant of the popular slate won’t deviate too much now, so future buyers of the model with the M1 Apple Silicon can expect a generally +50% faster device.
M1 iPad Pro vs Snapdragon 888 Tab S8: Apple’s new tablet can potentially destroy the future Samsung slate in synthetic benchmark testing
Not too many were expecting Apple to fit the 2021 iPad Pro with an M1 SoC, the same chip that can be found in the 2020 MacBook Air laptop and 2020 Mac Mini desktop. With these percentages in mind, Max Tech went ahead and created some potential benchmark performance scenarios that would see the 2021 iPad Pro outfoxing the Samsung Tab S8 months before the latter is even expected to be released (August). The popular YouTube channel also pitted the M1 iPad Pro against the M1 MacBook Air, while also remembering that the tablet’s form factor would require a lower-voltage variant of the Apple Silicon.
No, the 2021 iPad Pro won’t replace your laptop
Plump for a 1TB or 2TB model and once your bank account has stopped screaming you’ll have the headspace to fiddle with benchmarking software and discover there’s 16GB of RAM inside. The iPad Pro was no slouch before, but the combination of M1 and RAM provides headroom for the most demanding of apps, whether editing 4K video in LumaFusion, chaining together dozens of synths in a digital audio workstation, or crafting complex high-res multi-layered images in Affinity Photo. If you’re a photo, music or video editor, you’ll be frustrated by the screen’s confines, but appreciate the means to escape from a desk and work wherever you please, on powerful hardware, directly interacting with your creations.
If you’re someone who likes focus (a major Apple theme of late), the two-up app limitation – and just one in full-screen most of the time – moves you far away from the relative chaos and distraction found on a desktop PC or Mac.
Stop Calling the iPad Pro a Laptop Replacement. It’s Much More Than That
It wasn’t the first product with that name, and it was technically still an iPad, but the A12 Bionic processor inside made it more powerful than most of the laptops you could buy at the time. Sure, it got a small update in 2020, but it didn’t change anything about the way most people use the iPad Pro. In fact, by the time Apple announced the 2021 version in April, the iPad Pro was more in need of an update than anything besides maybe the iMac. It makes sense–surely the fact that Apple finally put a desktop-class processor inside the iPad Pro means that it can replace your computer, right?
Launching an app doesn’t require an intense amount of power, but it is something you do a hundred times a day. In terms of the overall experience of using a device, that might matter even more than how powerful it actually is for doing things like editing a podcast or exporting photos and videos. Apple crammed 10,000 tiny LEDs, grouped into 2,500 local dimming zones, which means that the display is capable of 1,000 nits of maximum full-screen brightness. In addition to being bright, each of those 2,500 dimming zones can turn on or off, meaning that if you’re watching a movie, the blacks will be deep and the contrast will be rich.
Certainly, if you’re editing HDR footage, that matters, but if I’m being honest, I wouldn’t say that the display itself is enough of a reason to buy the 12.9-inch version.
If the thing you do on a daily basis is fill in spreadsheets, don’t get an iPad Pro–get a MacBook Air or a Mac Mini. Desktop computers are great for that, and even if you need something to fill in your spreadsheets on the go, there are a lot of really lightweight and portable laptops. If the thing you do on a daily basis is sitting at a desk and editing photos, get one of the brand-new 24-inch iMacs.
By the way, unlike some of my fellow tech journalists, I don’t think Apple will put macOS on the iPad Pro, at least not anytime soon. Think about it this way: Apple is moving away from making you decide which device to get on the basis of things like memory or processing power.
M1 iPad Pro Benchmarks and Review
chip powering the older iPad Pro and the new M1 model, I relied on the popular Geekbench 5 app. This app runs on a number of platforms and performs a series of calculations to determine the relative power of different CPUs. Geekbench also runs a separate set of computations to determine the speed of a given system for gaming, image processing, or video editing. Geekbench Browser is an online comparison of performance, and unfortunately there aren’t enough M1 results in the database at this time for those iPads Pro to appear in the chart.
Now, I have no way to quantify this, but I’ve noticed two things that show improvement: viewing streaming video and gameplay. During the event at which the new iPads Pro debuted, I really didn’t get too excited about the new Center Stage feature. Using the ultra-wide front camera and machine learning, Center State keeps me in the frame as I move around. The floating design of the keyboard allows smooth adjustment of height and angle of the M1 iPad Pro, and the trackpad provides an “almost-MacBook” experience. Some testing with streamed movies from Apple TV proved to me that I need to get a better speaker system for my old HDTV! My wife and I take our iPads with us to a local taproom twice a month to enjoy some good brews and wonderful fish and chips from a food truck. With my older iPad Pro at that location, I found it difficult to stream video without significant issues. Not so with the new iPad Pro – I was able to watch several of my favorite YouTube channels and a SpaceX Starlink launch with smooth video.
Using the Thunderbolt port on the iPad, it’s possible to drive Apple’s Pro Display XDR at full 6K resolution. The last sentence of the previous section said it all – the new iPads Pro make it difficult to justify the purchase of a MacBook of any sort. They support some technologies that no MacBooks currently provide – 5G cellular data, Apple Pencil.
The Magic Keyboard is outstanding, and the trackpad support of iPadOS makes the iPad Pro even more MacBook-like.
Getting high performance no longer means having to buy a more expensive and heavier device that is less efficient.
Be First to Comment